KISS AND TELL: numerous pupils stated they certainly were generally speaking dissatisfied with all the hookup tradition.
In a September 2012 article, “Boys in the Side,” within the Atlantic mag, Hanna Rosin, writer of the recently released guide “The End of Men,” casts an eye that is critical the “hookup culture” of college campuses, arguing that the prevalence of casual intimate encounters is “an motor of feminine progress—one being harnessed and driven by ladies on their own.”
After interviewing a large number of undergraduate and graduate pupils at organizations maybe not unlike Bowdoin, Rosin concluded that “feminist progress now mainly is dependent on the presence of the hookup tradition. And also to a astonishing level, it’s women—not men—who are perpetuating the culture, particularly in school, cannily manipulating it to help make area with regards to their success, continuing to keep their very own ends at heart.”
Over a dozen interviews with Bowdoin pupils from a range of social teams, course years and intimate orientations implies that it is not usually the situation at Bowdoin, and that a lot of men and ladies are dissatisfied with all the hookup tradition right here, mostly as a consequence of an unspoken pair of guidelines that dictate exactly just how students begin navigating intercourse and dating during the university.
The interviewed pupils unilaterally consented that “hooking up” can mean “anything from kissing to presenting sex,” as Phoebe Kranefuss ’16 put it, and it is usually a “very casual” encounter. As Eric Edelman writes inside the op-ed this week, “Hookups may have just as much or as meaning that is little you place into them. They could just take the kind of friendly hellos, sloppy goodbyes, clear overtures of great interest, or careful explorations.”